螺旋桨风扇发动机 (None: Propfan)
Embed This Widget
Add the script tag and a data attribute to embed this widget.
Embed via iframe for maximum compatibility.
<iframe src="https://planefyi.com/iframe/glossary/propfan/" width="420" height="400" frameborder="0" style="border:0;border-radius:10px;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
Paste this URL in WordPress, Medium, or any oEmbed-compatible platform.
https://planefyi.com/glossary/propfan/
Add a dynamic SVG badge to your README or docs.
[](https://planefyi.com/glossary/propfan/)
Use the native HTML custom element.
Definition
采用后掠高负荷螺旋桨叶片的混合推进设计,将涡桨的燃油效率与涡扇级别的速度相结合。
What Is a Propfan?
A propfan — also known as an advanced turboprop, ultra-high bypass (UHB) engine, or unducted fan — is a propulsion concept occupying the performance space between conventional turboprops and high-bypass turbofans. It uses highly swept, thin, scimitar-shaped propeller blades operating at high blade loading to achieve turboprop-like propulsive efficiency while enabling cruise speeds of Mach 0.72–0.82 — comparable to mainstream narrowbody jetliners.
How It Works
The propfan's defining feature is its blade geometry. Classical propellers use relatively thick, moderately swept blades optimised for low speeds. Propfan blades are extremely thin (high aspect-ratio), swept aft 30–45°, and twisted to manage the spanwise variation in relative Mach number. These features delay compressibility effects and maintain efficiency as blade tips approach transonic speeds.
Most propfan designs use counter-rotating blade rows — typically 8+8 or 10+8 blades — to recover swirl energy and reduce disc loading, similar to the open rotor architecture. Some single-rotation variants exist. The lack of a surrounding nacelle duct means effective bypass ratios are theoretically unlimited, with early estimates suggesting 30:1 or higher.
Performance Specifications
- Cruise speed: Mach 0.72–0.82 (vs. Mach 0.50–0.65 for conventional turboprops)
- Fuel savings: 20–30% vs. contemporary high-bypass turbofans (1980s studies)
- Equivalent bypass ratio: 25:1 to 35:1
- Blade count: typically 8–10 per rotor in counter-rotating designs
- Blade sweep: 30–45° aft sweep
Aircraft Examples
- GE36 — tested on Boeing 727 and MD-80 in 1986–1988; demonstrated 30% fuel savings over JT8D
- Pratt & Whitney / Allison 578-DX — contra-rotating propfan tested on MD-80, 1989
- Progress D-27 — single-rotation propfan powering the Antonov An-70 tactical transport; entered limited Ukrainian military service; cruise speed Mach 0.7
- CFM RISE — the modern revival of the propfan concept as an open rotor engine, targeting entry into service approximately 2035
Propfan development reached its peak during the 1980s oil price shocks, with Boeing, Douglas, and Airbus all studying propfan-powered narrowbody concepts. The collapse of oil prices in 1986 and persistent noise concerns halted commercial development. The 2020s energy transition and aviation decarbonization targets have renewed interest under the open rotor branding, with CFM International's RISE program representing the most advanced current effort.